Fear of hypoglycemia: Influence on glycemic variability and self-management behavior in young adults with type 1 diabetes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.12.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine how fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) is associated with glycemic variability (GV) and self-management behavior in young adults (aged 18–35) with type 1 diabetes (T1DM).

Procedures

Using a prospective repeated-measures design, in 35 young adults, within- and between-person and temporal associations of FOH, specific self-management behaviors, and GV were measured. The data were collected using questionnaires and real-time measures using daily diaries, insulin pump downloads, actigraphy, and continuous glucose monitoring.

Findings

FOH was associated with greater glycemic variability. Significant temporal associations emerged. Concurrent day (glucose SD, p = .011) and previous-evening fear levels were associated with GV (glucose SD, p = .007). FOH was also associated with greater calorie intake (r = .492, p = .003) and less physical activity (light activity, r =  .341, p = .045).

Conclusions

The significant associations of FOH with GV, dietary patterns, and physical activity provide evidence for FOH as an important psychological factor associated with diabetes care.

Introduction

Near-normal glucose levels can reduce the occurrence and progression of diabetes-related complications (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group, 1994). However, as blood glucose approaches near-normal levels, the risk increases for hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia is life-threatening and can lead to serious physical and psychological sequelae and can in turn lead to profound fear of future hypoglycemic episodes (Vallis, Jones, & Pouwer, 2014). These distressing negative experiences influence health behaviors used in diabetes self-management (Lawton et al., 2013). Vigilance to avoid hypoglycemia is necessary; however, fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) can lead to perceived concerns of a mismatch between food intake (Richmond, 1996, Wu et al., 2011), insulin dose (Richmond, 1996), or physical activity (Brazeau, Rabasa-Lhoret, Strychar & Mircescu, 2008), resulting in over- or under-compensatory behaviors.

As a result of the over- or under-compensatory behaviors in response to FOH, blood glucose levels can vary greatly, leading to increased glycemic variability (GV; Gonder-Frederick et al., 2013). GV is defined as the intraday fluctuation in blood glucose (Cameron, Donath, & Baghurst, 2010). Emerging evidence supports the role that GV plays in the generation of oxidative stress (Quagliaro et al., 2003), endothelial dysfunction (Ceriello et al., 2012), and diabetes complications (Soupal et al., 2014). High degrees of GV are associated with more frequent episodes of hypoglycemia (Kilpatrick, Rigby, Goode, & Atkin, 2007) and glucose extremes (i.e., hypo- to hyperglycemic levels), which may occur with overtreatment of a hypoglycemic episode. GV is influenced by self-management behavior (Kildegaard, Christensen, & Hejlesen, 2009) and is amenable to change with appropriate intervention. The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) allows measurement of 24-h GV to better explore this problem. To our knowledge, the relationship of FOH to GV has not been examined using CGM technology. Young adults may be at particular risk for GV because they report higher FOH levels than adolescents (Bohme, Bertin, Cosson, & Chevalier, 2013); thus, it is critical to develop strategies to assist young adults in coping with FOH.

Changing dietary intake is a frequent strategy used in response to FOH (Richmond, 1996). Dietary modifications may include excessive eating (Ahola et al., 2016, Richmond, 1996), overcorrecting a hypoglycemic episode (Savard et al., 2016), or snacking at night (Desjardins et al., 2014, Weiner and Skipper, 1978). Stress-induced eating has been linked to diabetes distress (Martyn-Nemeth, Quinn, Hacker, Park, & Kujath, 2014), and binging in response to hypoglycemia is commonly reported (Lawton et al., 2013). In terms of medication management, insulin doses may be inappropriately reduced in anticipation or fear of future hypoglycemia (Di Battista, Hart, Greco, & Gloizer, 2009).

FOH has been reported to be a major barrier to engaging in a regular physical activity/exercise program (Brazeau et al., 2008, Pinsker et al., 2016). Certain types of activity may be limited due to the perception of a greater risk of hypoglycemia and difficulty managing it (Lascar et al., 2014). Many struggle to adhere to the recommended guidelines due to anxiety, FOH, and habituated responses to FOH (Lawton et al., 2013).

The purpose of this study was to examine how FOH is associated with GV and self-management behavior in young adults (aged 18–35) with T1DM. Young adults are an important group to study because they have reported high FOH levels (Bohme et al., 2013) and are in a critical developmental stage when they are entering the workforce, planning their families, and becoming financially independent (Arnett, 2001), all within the context of managing a chronic illness.

The specific aims were to examine: (1) the association of FOH with GV and (2) associations of FOH with self-management behaviors (dietary patterns, carbohydrate intake, insulin dosing, and physical activity); and to examine temporal associations of each.

Section snippets

Material and methods

A prospective repeated-measures design was used with real-time event monitoring, questionnaires, and a daily fear diary. The data were collected over six consecutive days.

Results

Two subjects experienced CGM recording failure and were not included in the analysis. The characteristics of the final sample are delineated in Table 1. There were 35 young adults (female 63%), aged 18 to 35 years (M = 26 ± 4), diagnosed with T1DM for 1 to 31 years (13 ± 8.1). The racial/ethnic distribution was White (88%), Black (9%), multiracial (3%), and Latino (6%). Sixty percent were single; 20% married, 17% living with a partner; and 89% lived away from their parents. Most had earned a college

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine FOH, GV, and self-management behavior prospectively using self-report and real-time measures. The major findings were: (1) FOH was associated with greater glycemic variability and (2) FOH was associated with higher calorie intake and less physical activity. Significant temporal relationships emerged in which concurrent-day and previous-evening FOH levels were associated with GV. These findings suggest that daily FOH serves as a

Conclusions

In summary, prospective examination of FOH in real time revealed that FOH was temporally associated with GV. FOH was also associated with higher calorie intake and less physical activity. Our findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample and exploratory nature of the study. However, we raise important questions regarding the association of FOH with GV and the need to examine these factors further to develop interventions to reduce or manage FOH to promote healthy diabetes

Acknowledgments

Supported by Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research (NIDDK P30 DK092949); the Dean's Office of the Biological Sciences Division of the University of Chicago; and the American Nurses Foundation.

References (40)

  • V.J. Briscoe et al.

    Type 1 diabetes: Exercise and hypoglycemia

    Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism

    (2007)
  • F.J. Cameron et al.

    Measuring glycaemic variation

    Current Diabetes Reviews

    (2010)
  • A. Ceriello et al.

    Evidence that hyperglycemia after recovery from hypoglycemia worsens endothelial function and increases oxidative stress and inflammation in healthy control subjects and subjects with type 1 diabetes

    Diabetes

    (2012)
  • K. Desjardins et al.

    Are bedtime nutritional strategies effective in preventing nocturnal hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes?

    Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism

    (2014)
  • A.M. Di Battista et al.

    Type 1 diabetes among adolescents: Reduced diabetes self-care caused by social fear and fear of hypoglycemia

    The Diabetes Educator

    (2009)
  • Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group

    Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

    Journal of Pediatrics

    (1994)
  • L.A. Gonder-Frederick et al.

    Psychometric properties of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II for adults with type 1 diabetes

    Diabetes Care

    (2011)
  • L.A. Gonder-Frederick et al.

    Examining the behaviour subscale of the hypoglycaemia fear survey: An international study

    Diabetic Medicine

    (2013)
  • L. Green et al.

    Fears and phobias in people with diabetes

    Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews

    (2000)
  • K.M. Hanna et al.

    The relationship of worry about hypoglycemia with diabetes-specific and typical youth behavior among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes

    The Diabetes Educator

    (2014)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Are nocturnal hypoglycemia prevention strategies influenced by diabetes technology usage? A BETTER registry analysis

      2022, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      FOH is a significant barrier to optimal T1D management [34], as many PWT1D tend to maintain higher glucose levels to avoid experiencing the negative effects of hypoglycemia [35]. This can negatively influence diabetes management as FOH was found to be associated with higher caloric intake and greater glycemic variability [36], and has been identified as a significant barrier to participating in physical activities [37]. Specifically, worrying about hypoglycemia during sleep (HFS-worry item) was reported by 86 % of the participants, with participants who have experienced NH in the past month reporting significantly more worries about becoming hypoglycemic during sleep (p < 0.001), thus potentially explaining the higher prevalence of using strategies by these participants.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Author Disclosure Statement: No disclosures.

    View full text