Healthcare utilization and costs in diabetes relative to the clinical spectrum of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Introduction
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common neurologic sequela of diabetes, and when the resulting nerve damage is accompanied by painful symptoms it is known as painful DPN (pDPN). The presence of pDPN is associated with a substantial adverse impact on patient function, quality of life, and work productivity, and also results in an economic burden relative to the general population and to patients with diabetes without pDPN (Benbow et al., 1998, daCosta DiBonaventura et al., 2011, Dworkin, Malone, Panarites, Armstrong and Pham, 2010, Dworkin et al., 2011, Gore et al., 2005, Ritzwoller et al., 2009, Stewart et al., 2007). These effects have been reported to be greater as pain severity increases (Dibonaventura et al., 2011, Gore et al., 2005, Sadosky et al., 2013).
As integrated healthcare systems develop new care delivery models to manage the increasing burden of expensive chronic conditions, such as diabetes, in accord with Affordable Care Act, a deeper understanding of the clinical problems and types of care that disproportionately contribute to the high costs at the population level is required. However, there have been no studies comparing healthcare resource utilization and costs of diabetes relative to DPN, pDPN, and severe pDPN.
Electronic medical records (EMR) capture real-world, patient-level data representing integral components of provider care that are not readily available in claims databases including patient-reported outcomes such as pain severity. The availability of these data enables identification of discrete populations and evaluation of resources and costs across inpatient and outpatient settings. This characterization is essential to managed care, especially accountable care organizations, providing the background and understanding required to implement more targeted disease management strategies (Eggleston & Finkelstein, 2014). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to apply EMR-derived clinical information from the Humedica database to evaluate the direct medical costs of patients with diabetes relative to DPN, pDPN, and severe pDPN. This clinical database facilitates identification and management of patients with chronic conditions who are at risk for greater clinical complexity and higher costs of care.
Section snippets
Data source
Data for this retrospective study were derived from the Humedica EMR database, which has broad geographic representation and includes information on demographics, diagnoses, inpatient and outpatient encounters, medications, procedures, lab results, vital signs, and select data derived from physicians' notes. Humedica does not mandate a particular EMR system, and in the more than 20 provider groups, many run multiple EMR installations for different sites of care. Records are linked using a
Cohort populations
As shown in Table 1, the four cohorts derived from the 24,257,806 patients in the Humedica database for the specified time period consisted of 288,328 patients with diabetes only; 35,050 with DPN; 3,449 with pDPN; and 1824 with severe pDPN, which represents 52.9% of the patients with pDPN. Among the pDPN patients, there was no difference in mean (SD) pain scores collected in inpatient (n = 1724) and outpatient (n = 1725) settings, 6.4 (2.9) and 6.3 (2.6), respectively.
Significant differences were
Discussion
This study is the first to evaluate and compare all-cause healthcare resource utilization and direct medical costs of diabetes relative to the spectrum of DPN, including DPN without pain, pDPN, and severe pDPN, the latter defined by a pain severity score ≥ 7. The results show that as a result of greater use of healthcare resources, total all-cause medical costs as well as costs for each resource category (based on charges rather than on patient costs) were significantly higher with DPN, pDPN,
Conclusions
This study provides an initial step in characterizing the spectrum from diabetes to severe pDPN. Patients with DPN, pDPN, and severe pDPN had significantly greater healthcare resource utilization and costs than diabetes-only patients, and the highest burden was associated with severe pDPN. Although additional studies are needed to identify characteristics that may be predictive of pDPN and its high healthcare burden, this study also provides a foundation for future research on developing and
References (18)
- et al.
Consensus guidelines: Treatment planning and options
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
(2006) - et al.
Impact of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy on health care costs
The Journal of Pain
(2010) - et al.
Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: An overview and literature update
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
(2010) - et al.
Pain severity in diabetic peripheral neuropathy is associated with patient functioning, symptom levels of anxiety and depression, and sleep
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
(2005) - et al.
Identification of cut-points for mild, moderate and severe pain due to diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Pain
(2005) - et al.
EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision
European Journal of Neurology
(2010) - et al.
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and quality of life
Quarterly Journal of Medicine
(1998) - et al.
A longitudinal assessment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy on health status, productivity, and health care utilization and cost
Pain Medicine
(2011) - et al.
Association between pain severity and health care resource use, health status, productivity and related costs in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients
Pain Medicine
(2011)
Cited by (87)
Spinal cord stimulation in painful diabetic neuropathy: An overview
2023, Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeAutophagy-nutrient sensing pathways in diabetic complications
2022, Pharmacological ResearchCapsaicin, its clinical significance in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy
2022, Biomedicine and PharmacotherapyCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, up to 50 % of patients suffering from diabetic peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy present with painful neuropathic symptoms [43]. Documented evidence indicates that accompanying reduced quality of life, these painful symptoms are generally severe and frequently lead to depression, anxiety, and sleep disarrays [44,45]. Currently, regular exercise in combination with optimal maintenance of diet remains one of the leading interventions to used manage and even reverse complications linked with T2D or metabolic syndrome [46–48].
Comparison of amitriptyline supplemented with pregabalin, pregabalin supplemented with amitriptyline, and duloxetine supplemented with pregabalin for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (OPTION-DM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised crossover trial
2022, The LancetCitation Excerpt :Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is associated with symptoms of burning, electric-shock type, lancinating, and deep-aching pains in the feet and legs and later in the upper limbs.1 Moderate-to-severe unremitting pain is present in over 70% of patients with DPNP resulting in insomnia, poor quality of life, mood disorders,2 and 5-times increased health-care costs compared with diabetes alone.1,3 Chronic hyperglycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors have been shown to increase the risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy,2 but the risk factors for DPNP and its pathophysiology are not fully understood.1
Sex disparities in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis
2021, American Heart Journal
Disclosures: Alesia Sadosky, Jack Mardekian, Bruce Parsons, and Markay Hopps are employees and shareholders of Pfizer, the sponsor of this study; E. Jay Bienen is an independent scientific consultant who was funded by Pfizer in connection with manuscript development; John Markman collaborated with Pfizer on the project but was not financially compensated for his involvement on the project, including manuscript development.
Funding: This study was funded by Pfizer, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement: There are no other financial relationships or relevant conflicts related to this manuscript.