Healthcare utilization and costs in diabetes relative to the clinical spectrum of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.10.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Aims

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) accompanied by painful symptoms is known as painful DPN (pDPN). This study characterized healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with DPN, pDPN, and severe pDPN relative to diabetes only.

Methods

Four adult cohorts were identified from the Humedica database: type 2 diabetes without DPN (n = 288,328); DPN (n = 35,050); pDPN (DPN subjects with a pain score ≥ 1 on a 0–10 numeric rating scale; n = 3449); and severe pDPN (pain scores 7–10; n = 1824). Resource utilization and costs for 12-months post-diagnosis were compared for diabetes relative to the other cohorts.

Results

Demographic characteristics were different across cohorts. Relative to diabetes alone, DPN, pDPN, and severe pDPN were characterized by significantly higher proportions of patients with resource utilization for all resource categories (all P < 0.0001); the highest resource use generally observed for severe pDPN. Total annual direct medical costs were $6632 for diabetes only, with costs for DPN ($12,492), pDPN ($27,931), and severe pDPN ($30,755) significantly higher (all P < 0.0001); outpatient costs were consistently the primary driver of total costs.

Conclusions

Patients with DPN, pDPN, and severe pDPN had significantly greater healthcare resource utilization and costs than patients with diabetes only, with the highest burden associated with severe pDPN.

Introduction

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common neurologic sequela of diabetes, and when the resulting nerve damage is accompanied by painful symptoms it is known as painful DPN (pDPN). The presence of pDPN is associated with a substantial adverse impact on patient function, quality of life, and work productivity, and also results in an economic burden relative to the general population and to patients with diabetes without pDPN (Benbow et al., 1998, daCosta DiBonaventura et al., 2011, Dworkin, Malone, Panarites, Armstrong and Pham, 2010, Dworkin et al., 2011, Gore et al., 2005, Ritzwoller et al., 2009, Stewart et al., 2007). These effects have been reported to be greater as pain severity increases (Dibonaventura et al., 2011, Gore et al., 2005, Sadosky et al., 2013).

As integrated healthcare systems develop new care delivery models to manage the increasing burden of expensive chronic conditions, such as diabetes, in accord with Affordable Care Act, a deeper understanding of the clinical problems and types of care that disproportionately contribute to the high costs at the population level is required. However, there have been no studies comparing healthcare resource utilization and costs of diabetes relative to DPN, pDPN, and severe pDPN.

Electronic medical records (EMR) capture real-world, patient-level data representing integral components of provider care that are not readily available in claims databases including patient-reported outcomes such as pain severity. The availability of these data enables identification of discrete populations and evaluation of resources and costs across inpatient and outpatient settings. This characterization is essential to managed care, especially accountable care organizations, providing the background and understanding required to implement more targeted disease management strategies (Eggleston & Finkelstein, 2014). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to apply EMR-derived clinical information from the Humedica database to evaluate the direct medical costs of patients with diabetes relative to DPN, pDPN, and severe pDPN. This clinical database facilitates identification and management of patients with chronic conditions who are at risk for greater clinical complexity and higher costs of care.

Section snippets

Data source

Data for this retrospective study were derived from the Humedica EMR database, which has broad geographic representation and includes information on demographics, diagnoses, inpatient and outpatient encounters, medications, procedures, lab results, vital signs, and select data derived from physicians' notes. Humedica does not mandate a particular EMR system, and in the more than 20 provider groups, many run multiple EMR installations for different sites of care. Records are linked using a

Cohort populations

As shown in Table 1, the four cohorts derived from the 24,257,806 patients in the Humedica database for the specified time period consisted of 288,328 patients with diabetes only; 35,050 with DPN; 3,449 with pDPN; and 1824 with severe pDPN, which represents 52.9% of the patients with pDPN. Among the pDPN patients, there was no difference in mean (SD) pain scores collected in inpatient (n = 1724) and outpatient (n = 1725) settings, 6.4 (2.9) and 6.3 (2.6), respectively.

Significant differences were

Discussion

This study is the first to evaluate and compare all-cause healthcare resource utilization and direct medical costs of diabetes relative to the spectrum of DPN, including DPN without pain, pDPN, and severe pDPN, the latter defined by a pain severity score ≥ 7. The results show that as a result of greater use of healthcare resources, total all-cause medical costs as well as costs for each resource category (based on charges rather than on patient costs) were significantly higher with DPN, pDPN,

Conclusions

This study provides an initial step in characterizing the spectrum from diabetes to severe pDPN. Patients with DPN, pDPN, and severe pDPN had significantly greater healthcare resource utilization and costs than diabetes-only patients, and the highest burden was associated with severe pDPN. Although additional studies are needed to identify characteristics that may be predictive of pDPN and its high healthcare burden, this study also provides a foundation for future research on developing and

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (87)

  • Spinal cord stimulation in painful diabetic neuropathy: An overview

    2023, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
  • Capsaicin, its clinical significance in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy

    2022, Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, up to 50 % of patients suffering from diabetic peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy present with painful neuropathic symptoms [43]. Documented evidence indicates that accompanying reduced quality of life, these painful symptoms are generally severe and frequently lead to depression, anxiety, and sleep disarrays [44,45]. Currently, regular exercise in combination with optimal maintenance of diet remains one of the leading interventions to used manage and even reverse complications linked with T2D or metabolic syndrome [46–48].

  • Comparison of amitriptyline supplemented with pregabalin, pregabalin supplemented with amitriptyline, and duloxetine supplemented with pregabalin for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (OPTION-DM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised crossover trial

    2022, The Lancet
    Citation Excerpt :

    Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is associated with symptoms of burning, electric-shock type, lancinating, and deep-aching pains in the feet and legs and later in the upper limbs.1 Moderate-to-severe unremitting pain is present in over 70% of patients with DPNP resulting in insomnia, poor quality of life, mood disorders,2 and 5-times increased health-care costs compared with diabetes alone.1,3 Chronic hyperglycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors have been shown to increase the risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy,2 but the risk factors for DPNP and its pathophysiology are not fully understood.1

View all citing articles on Scopus

Disclosures: Alesia Sadosky, Jack Mardekian, Bruce Parsons, and Markay Hopps are employees and shareholders of Pfizer, the sponsor of this study; E. Jay Bienen is an independent scientific consultant who was funded by Pfizer in connection with manuscript development; John Markman collaborated with Pfizer on the project but was not financially compensated for his involvement on the project, including manuscript development.

Funding: This study was funded by Pfizer, Inc.

Conflict of interest statement: There are no other financial relationships or relevant conflicts related to this manuscript.

View full text