Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 209-213, May 2010

Sitagliptin treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes does not affect CD4+ T-cell activation

  • Perrin C. White

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9063, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9063, USA. Tel.: +1 214 648 3501; fax: +1 214 648 9772.
    • PCW is the Audry Newman Rapoport Distinguished Chair in Pediatric Endocrinology.
  • ,
  • Heidi Chamberlain-Shea

      Affiliations

    • Endocrine Associates of Dallas, Dallas, TX 75093, USA
  • ,
  • Maria-Teresa de la Morena

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9063, USA

Received 21 May 2009; received in revised form 10 August 2009; accepted 10 September 2009. published online 26 October 2009.

Abstract 

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP4) inhibitors have recently become widely used for treating type 2 diabetes, but in meta-analyses are associated with a mildly increased risk of all-cause infections. CD26 is a cell-surface form of DPP4 which can costimulate T-cell proliferation, raising the possibility that DPP4 inhibitors might adversely affect immune function. To address this issue in an observational study, two groups of 20 subjects each were recruited from a private endocrinology practice; one group consisted of type 2 diabetes patients treated for at least 6 months with the DPP4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, whereas patients in the other group had never been treated with this agent. The groups were similar with regard to sex and racial composition, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, and use of other medications for diabetes, but the sitagliptin group was slightly older. A blood sample from each patient was analyzed for CD4+ T-cell activation in response to phytohemagglutinin using adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-stimulated bioluminescence. There was not a significant difference in T-cell activation between the treatment groups (median, 419 and 481 ng/ml ATP in the groups that were and were not treated with sitagliptin, respectively). Thus the observed increased rate of infection in diabetic patients treated with sitagliptin cannot be explained by a major effect on T-cell activation. Randomized studies, preferably using several assays of immune function, should be performed to confirm and extend these findings.

Keywords: Dipeptidyl peptidase IV, Immune suppression, ATP, Bioluminescence

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosure statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

PII: S1056-8727(09)00092-0

doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2009.09.001

Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 209-213, May 2010