Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 145-152, May 2006

Prandial insulin substitution with insulin lispro or insulin lispro mid mixture vs. basal therapy with insulin glargine: A randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes beginning insulin therapy

  • Christof Kazda

      Affiliations

    • Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 0 6172 273 961; fax: +49 0 6172 273 2182.
  • ,
  • Hiltrud Hülstrunk

      Affiliations

    • Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Karin Helsberg

      Affiliations

    • Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Frank Langer

      Affiliations

    • Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Thomas Forst

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Research and Development, Mainz, Germany
  • ,
  • Markolf Hanefeld

      Affiliations

    • Center for Clinical Studies, GWT Technical University, Dresden, Germany

Received 18 April 2005; received in revised form 1 September 2005; accepted 19 September 2005.

Abstract 

Purpose

To compare the effects of prandial insulin therapy focusing on postprandial glucose control vs. basal insulin therapy focusing on fasting glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

This was an open-label, randomized, parallel, three-arm multicenter trial in patients with type 2 diabetes starting insulin treatment. Patients (n=159) were randomly assigned to 24-week treatment with 3× daily insulin lispro, 3× daily lispro mid mixture (MidMix; 50% lispro, 50% protaminated lispro), or 1× daily insulin glargine; oral antihyperglycemic agents were discontinued. Primary end point was the postprandial glucose excursion 2 h after breakfast at the end of study. Secondary outcomes included HbA1c, self-monitored blood glucose profiles, hypoglycemic episodes, body weight, and patient satisfaction.

Results

At the end of study, glucose excursions 2 h after breakfast were significantly lower with lispro and MidMix than with glargine (P<.001 for each vs. glargine): lispro, −0.6±2.0 mmol/l; MidMix, +0.8±2.4 mmol/l; glargine, +2.5±2.4 mmol/l. Fasting glucose decreases were significantly greater with glargine (−2.6±2.4 mmol/l) than with lispro or MidMix (−0.9±2.2 mmol/l; +0.9±1.8 mmol/l). Nevertheless, HbA1c decreased by 1.1% (lispro) and 1.2% (MidMix), vs. 0.3% with glargine. Hypoglycemic episodes were rare with 1–1.5 self-reported episodes per 100 patient-days.

Conclusions

In patients with type 2 diabetes starting insulin, 3× daily prandial treatment with a rapid-acting analog focusing on postprandial glucose values enabled better control of postprandial and circadian blood glucose profiles than once-daily glargine, in spite suboptimal fasting glucose levels, which targets fasting glucose values. These results support studies suggesting that control of postprandial hyperglycemia plays a key role in achieving HbA1c targets.

Keywords: Multicenter study, Insulin analog, Postprandial blood glucose, HbA1c

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by grants from Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.

PII: S1056-8727(05)00124-8

doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2005.09.004

Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 145-152, May 2006