Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 153-157, May 2006
Glycemic control with regular versus lispro insulin sliding scales in hospitalized Type 2 diabetics☆☆☆
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare glycemic control with either regular or lispro insulin sliding scales in hospitalized Type 2 diabetics who were not using insulin as outpatients.
Methods
Forty-three patients with Type 2 diabetes, who were taking oral agents only, were admitted to a medical inpatient service and randomized to receive either regular or lispro insulin sliding scale. Oral agents for diabetes were held upon admission and patients were followed throughout their hospital stay.
Results
There was no significant difference (P>.05) between the average finger-stick blood glucose (FSBG) in the regular insulin group (157.78±40.16 mg/dl) and the lispro insulin group (152.04±27.71 mg/dl). No significant difference was found between the daily dose of insulin (regular, 5.83±5.01 units; lispro, 4.27±3.40 units), total amount of insulin used during hospitalization (regular, 11.87±10.78 units; lispro, 12.77±14.39 units), glucose excursion (regular, 110.13±25.86 mg/dl; lispro, 106.77±52.65 mg/dl), or length of hospital stay (regular, 2.33±1.23 days; lispro, 2.69±1.59 days).
Conclusion
No significant difference in glycemic control was found in hospitalized Type 2 diabetic patients who received either regular or lispro insulin sliding scales. Both insulin sliding scales used in this study are inadequate to achieve current recommended glycemic targets in this patient population, when used as the only inpatient treatment for diabetes.
Keywords: Lispro, Regular, Insulin, Sliding scales
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ Financial support statement: No author has any financial or commercial interest in any part of this study.
☆☆ Propriety statement: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Army, the U.S. Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.
PII: S1056-8727(05)00078-4
doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2005.06.009
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 153-157, May 2006
