Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications
Volume 15, Issue 6 , Pages 287-294, November 2001

Diabetic retinopathy, visual acuity, and medical risk indicators. A continuous 10-year follow-up study in Type 1 diabetic patients under routine care

  • M Lövestam-Adrian

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Lund SE-221 85, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Fax: +46-46-172721
  • ,
  • C.-D Agardh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
  • ,
  • O Torffvit

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • E Agardh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

Received 29 January 2001; received in revised form 6 June 2001; accepted 13 June 2001.

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to describe incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy in relation to medical risk indicators as well as visual acuity outcome after a continuous follow-up period of 10 years in a Type 1 diabetic population treated under routine care. The incidence and progression of retinopathy and their association to HbA1c, blood pressure, urinary albumin, serum creatinine levels, and insulin dosage were studied prospectively in 452 Type 1 diabetic patients. The degree of retinopathy was classified as no retinopathy, background, or sight-threatening retinopathy, i.e. clinically significant macular edema, severe nonproliferative, or proliferative retinopathy. Impaired visual acuity was defined as a visual acuity <0.5 and blindness as a visual acuity ≤0.1 in the best eye. In patients still alive at follow-up (n=344), 61% (69/114) developed any retinopathy, 45% (51/114) background retinopathy, and 16% (18/114) sight-threatening retinopathy. Progression from background to sight-threatening retinopathy occurred in 56% (73/131). In 2% (6/335), visual acuity dropped to <0.5 and in less than 1% (3/340) to ≤0.1. Patients who developed any retinopathy and patients who progressed to sight-threatening retinopathy had higher mean HbA1c levels over time compared to those who remained stable (P<.001 in both cases). Patients who developed any retinopathy had higher levels of mean diastolic blood pressure (P=.036), whereas no differences were seen in systolic blood pressure levels between the groups. Cox regression analysis, including all patients, showed mean HbA1c to be an independent risk indicator for both development and progression of retinopathy, whereas mean diastolic blood pressure was only a risk indicator for the incidence of retinopathy. Metabolic control is an important risk indicator for both development and progression of retinopathy, whereas diastolic blood pressure is important for the development of retinopathy in Type 1 diabetes. The number of patients who became blind during 10 years of follow-up was low.

Keywords:  Diabetes mellitus, Retinopathy, Visual outcome, Metabolic control, Hypertension, Type 1 diabetes

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1056-8727(01)00167-2

Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications
Volume 15, Issue 6 , Pages 287-294, November 2001